4.1 Article

Issues that impact on Aboriginal Health Workers' and Registered Nurses' provision of diabetes health care in rural and remote health settings

期刊

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 306-312

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12062

关键词

aboriginal health; community care; diabetes management; health professionals

资金

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences Partnership Grant Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an established health problem for Indigenous Australians. One strategy to address this issue is to educate health professionals in diabetes management and education. ObjectiveThe objective of this paper is to identify important issues that compromise the clinical practice of rural and remote Aboriginal health workers (AHWs) and registered nurses (RNs) who undertook an accredited Australian Diabetes Educators Association diabetes course and to suggest strategies to improve practice. DesignThe design used a qualitative approach and discussion schedule to elicit responses. SettingThe setting involved two Aboriginal community controlled and seven mainstream health services in the Far Western region of New South Wales. ParticipantsThe participants were experienced diabetes educators (RNs and AHWs), managers and students currently enrolled in the course (n=17). ResultsThe results indicated issues that compromise diabetes practice and identified strategies to improve practice. Issues were: the confusing funding practices by health providers, the duplication of health services, the lack of recognition of diabetes qualifications and the transient nature of Indigenous people. Strategies included the need for: continuous dedicated diabetes health funding, a role clarification for diabetes educators, strategic diabetes planning and the importance of diabetes educators working in partnership. ConclusionThe conclusion from this study indicates that if the delivery of diabetes health services to Indigenous Australians is to improve it is necessary to address these identified issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据