4.1 Article

New Zealand rural primary health care workforce in 2005: More than just a doctor shortage

期刊

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 40-46

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00949.x

关键词

health occupations; manpower; population dynamics; primary health care; rural health services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To obtain a 2005 snapshot of New Zealand (NZ) rural primary health care workforce, specifically GPs, general practice nurses and community pharmacists. Design: Postal questionnaires, November 2005. Setting: NZ-wide rural general practices and community pharmacies. Participants: Rural general practice managers, GPs, nurses, community pharmacy managers and pharmacists. Main outcome measures: Self-reported data: demographics, country of training, years in practice, business ownership, hours worked including on-call, intention to leave rural practice. Results: General practices: response rate 95% (2061 217); 70% GP-owned, practice size ranged from one GP/one nurse to 12 GPs/nine nurses. Pharmacies: Response rate 90% (147/163). Majority had one (33%) or two (32%) pharmacists; <10% bad more than three pharmacists. GPs: response rate 64% (358/559), 71% male, 73% aged >40, 61% full-time, 79% provide on-call, 57% overseas-trained, 78% male and 57% female GPs aged >40; more full-time male GPs (76%) than female (37%). Nurses: response rate 65% (445/685), 97% female, 73% aged >40, 31% fulltime, 28% provide on-call, 84% NZ-trained, 45% consulted independently in 'nurse-clinics' within practice setting. Pharmacists: response rate 96% (248/258), 52 % male, 66% aged >40, 71 % full-time, 33 % provide on-call 92% NZ-trained, 55% sole/partner pharmacy owners. Many intend to leave NZ rural practice within 5 years: GPs (34%), nurses (25%) and pharmacists (47%). Conclusion: This is the first NZ-wide rural workforce survey to include a range of rural primary health care providers (GPs, nurses and pharmacists). Ageing rural primary health care workforce and intentions to leave herald worsening workforce shortages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据