3.8 Article

Antimicrobial dendrimeric peptides

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 269, 期 3, 页码 923-932

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02728.x

关键词

dendrimeric peptides; peptide antibiotics

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA36544] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI46164] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendrimeric peptides selective for microbial surfaces have been developed to achieve broad antimicrobial activity and low hemolytic activity to human erythrocytes. The dendrimeric core is an asymmetric lysine branching tethered with two to eight copies of a tetrapeptide (R4) or an octapeptide (R8). The R4 tetrapeptide (RLYR) contains a putative microbial surface recognition BHHB motif (B = basic, H = hydrophobic amino acid) found in protegrins and tachyplesins whereas the octapeptide R8 (RLYRKVYG) consists of an R4 and a degenerated R4 repeat. Antimicrobial assays against 10 organisms in high- and low-salt conditions showed that the R4 and R8 monomers as well as their divalent dendrimers contain no to low activity. In contrast. the tetra- and octavalent R4 and R8 dendrimers are broadly active under either conditions. exhibiting relatively similar potency with minimal inhibition concentrations < 1 μM against both bacteria and fungi. Based on their size and charge similarities, the potency, and activity spectrum of the tetravalent R4 dendrimer are comparable to protegrins and tachyplesins, a family of potent antimicrobials containing 17-19 residues. Compared with a series of linearly repeating R4 peptides. the R4 dendrimers show comparable antimicrobial potency. but are more aqueous soluble, more stable to proteolysis, less toxic to human cells and more easily synthesized chemically. These results suggest repeating peptides that cluster the charge and hydrophobic residues may represent a primitive form of microbial pattern-recognition. Incorporating such knowledge in a dendrimeric design therefore presents an attractive approach for developing novel peptide antibiotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据