4.8 Article

Polymorphisms in the interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, and transforming growth factor-β1 genes in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with interferon and ribavirin

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 271-277

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00243-4

关键词

cytokines; gene promoter; leader sequence; polymorphism; hepatitis C virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: In hepatitis C infection, the production of inappropriate cytokine levels appears to contribute to viral persistence and to affect the response to antiviral therapy. Additionally, polymorphisms in the cytokine genes may affect the production of the cytokines. In this study, we determined the frequency of the genotypes associated with polymorphisms of the interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene promoters, and transforming growth factor-beta1 gene leader sequence, and investigated their association with clinical features and the response to interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C infection. Methods: Genomic DNA from 80 patients and 37 racially matched healthy controls was studied by polymerase chain reaction and direct automated sequencing. Results: The interleukin-10 -1082 G/G genotype was identified more frequently in patients than in controls (P = 0.048). The transforming-growth factor-beta1 +29 (codon 10) C/C genotype was associated with resistance to the therapy (P = 0.029). After adjusting for potential confounding variables, patients exhibiting the C/C genotype were less likely to respond to treatment than patients with the T/T or T/C genotypes. Conclusions: These results suggest that inheritance of the interleukin-10 -1082 G/G and the transforming growth factor-beta1 +29 C/C genotypes, which appear to affect the cytokine production, may be associated with susceptibility to chronic hepatitis C infection and resistance to combined antiviral therapy. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据