4.6 Article

Modified regression model for the Logan plot

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200202000-00012

关键词

Logan plot; graphical analysis; positron emission tomography

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA011653-05, R01 AA011653-01A1, R01 AA011653-03, AA-11653, R01 AA011653-04, R01 AA011653, R01 AA011653-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG014400-02, R01 AG014400-03, AG-14400] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [F32 DA005707, DA-05707, R01 DA005707, DA-06275] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK050183-03, R01 DK050183, R01 DK050183-04A1, R01 DK050183-07, R01 DK050183-06, R01 DK050183-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Logan's graphical model is a robust estimation of the total distribution volume (DVt) of reversibly bound radiopharmaceuticals, but the resulting DVt values decrease with increasing noise. The authors hypothesized that the noise dependence can be reduced by a linear regression model that minimizes the sum of squared perpendicular rather than vertical (y) distances between the data points and fitted straight line. To test the new method, 15 levels of simulated noise (repeated 2,000 times) were added to synthetic tissue activity curves, calculated from two different sets of kinetic parameters. Contrary to the traditional method, there was no (P > 0.05) or dramatically decreased noise dependence with the perpendicular model. Real dynamic C-11 (+) McN5652 serotonin transporter binding data were processed either by applying Logan analysis to average counts of large areas or by averaging the Logan slopes of individual-voxel data. There were no significant differences between the parameters when the perpendicular regression method was used with both approaches. The presented experiments show that the DVt calculated from the Logan plot is much less noise dependent if the linear regression model accounts for errors in both the x and y variables, allowing fast creation of unbiased parametric images from dynamic positron-emission tomography studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据