4.8 Article

Cardiomyopathy in zebrafish due to mutation in an alternatively spliced exon of titin

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 205-209

出版社

NATURE AMERICA INC
DOI: 10.1038/ng816

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The zebrafish embryo is transparent and can tolerate absence of blood flow because its oxygen is delivered by diffusion rather than by the cardiovascular system(1). It is therefore possible to attribute cardiac failure directly to particular genes by ruling out the possibility that it is due to a secondary effect of hypoxia. We focus here on pickwick(m171) (pik(m171)), a recessive lethal mutation discovered in a large-scale genetic screen(2). There are three other alleles in the pik complementation group with this phenotype (pik(m242), pik(m740), pik(m186); ref. 3) and one allele (pik(mVO62H)) with additional skeletal paralysis(4). The pik heart develops normally but is poorly contractile from the first beat. Aside from the edema that inevitably accompanies cardiac dysfunction, development is normal during the first three days. We show by positional cloning that the 'causative' mutation is in an alternatively-spliced exon of the gene (ttn) encoding Titin. Titin is the biggest known protein and spans the half-sarcomere from Z-disc to M-line in heart and skeletal muscles. It has been proposed to provide a scaffold for the assembly of thick and thin filaments(6) and to provide elastic recoil engendered by stretch during diastole(7). We found that nascent myofibrils form in pik mutants, but normal sarcomeres are absent. Mutant cells transplanted to wildtype hearts remain thin and bulge outwards as individual cell aneurysms without affecting nearby wildtype cardiomyocytes, indicating that the contractile deficiency is cell-autonomous. Absence of Titin function thus results in blockage of sarcomere assembly and causes a functional disorder resembling human dilated cardiomyopathies, one form of which is described in another paper in this issue(8).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据