相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Bias among forensic document examiners: Still a need for procedural changes
Reinoud D. Stoel et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2014)
On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect
K. A. Martire et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2014)
The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of forensic comparison of glass
Loene M. Howes et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2014)
Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: Definition, numbers, impact and communication
Ate Kloosterman et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS (2014)
Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?
Nikola K. P. Osborne et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2014)
Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
Sherry Nakhaeizadeh et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2014)
Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science
Christophe Champod
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2014)
Individualization is dead, long live individualization! Reforms of reporting practices for fingerprint analysis in the United States
Simon A. Cole
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK (2014)
The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions
Kristy A. Martire et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2013)
Identification personified
Jason M. Tangen
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2013)
Forensic scientists' conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report-users?
Loene M. Howes et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments
Peter A. F. Fraser-Mackenzie et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2013)
The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
Bryan Found et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2013)
The ambition to be scientific: Human expert performance and objectivity
Itiel Dror
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2013)
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
Saul M. Kassin et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2013)
Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?
Daniel C. Murrie et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2013)
The Expression and Interpretation of Uncertain Forensic Science Evidence: Verbal Equivalence, Evidence Strength, and the Weak Evidence Effect
Kristy A. Martire et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2013)
Cognitive forensics and experimental research about bias in forensic casework
Itiel E. Dror
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2012)
What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?
William C. Thompson
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2011)
Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison
Itiel E. Dror et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2011)
Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
Itiel E. Dror et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2011)
Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement
Colin Aitken et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2011)
Identifying Fingerprint Expertise
Jason M. Tangen et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
Does suggestive information cause a confirmation bias in bullet comparisons?
Jose Kerstholt et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2010)
The use of technology in human expert domains: challenges and risks arising from the use of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensic science
I. E. Dror et al.
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK (2010)
The vision in blind justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition
Itiel E. Dror et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2010)
On proper research and understanding of the interplay between bias and decision outcomes
Itiel E. Dror
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2009)
Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: the new epistemology of forensic identification
S. A. Cole
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK (2009)
Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?
Lisa J. Hall et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2008)
Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts
Itiel Dror et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2008)
The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisation
Beatrice Schiffer et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2007)
Shoe print examinations: Effects of expectation, complexity and experience
Jose H. Kerstholt et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2007)
Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications
IE Dror et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2006)
The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science
MJ Saks et al.
SCIENCE (2005)
Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
MJ Saks et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2003)
分享论文
