4.7 Article

Preliminary evaluation of a multicomponent program for nutrition and physical activity change in primary care: PACE+ for adults

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 153-161

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0964

关键词

physical activity; exercise; diet; nutrition; primary care provider; health communication technology; health behavior change; health promotion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Patient-centered Assessment and Counseling on Exercise plus nutrition (PACE+) is an intervention based in primary care settings to help patients change physical activity and dietary behaviors. Methods. One hundred seventy-three adults were assessed before and after a 4-month intervention. All patients completed a computerized assessment and created tailored action plans to change one physical activity and one nutrition behavior that they then discussed with their provider. After the visit, subjects were randomized to one of four extended intervention conditions: control, mail only, infrequent phone and mail, and frequent phone and mail. Self-report of five target behaviors (moderate and vigorous physical activity stage of change, dietary fat, fruit/vegetable intake, and overeating behaviors) was collected at baseline and 4 months. Acceptability measures were also taken. Results. Participants in all conditions improved on all behaviors over time, supporting the utility of the computer and provider counseling components. The extended intervention did not produce differential results with respect to mode (phone or mail) or intensity (frequent or infrequent). However, for each behavior, participants who targeted the behavior to change improved significantly more than those who did not target the behavior. Acceptability of the intervention was high. Conclusions. Primary care-based, interactive health communication to improve physical activity and dietary behavior is feasible and has promising initial results. (C) 2001 American Health Foundation and Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据