4.0 Article

Rapid decline in sputum IL-10 concentration following occupational smoke exposure

期刊

INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 133-140

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/089583701753403953

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [1P30 ES 06694] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIOSH CDC HHS [1K01 OH 00172] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acute effects of smoke exposure on inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-alpha) are not well understood. Our study was designed to measure sputum concentrations of these cytokines in firefighters following low-level smoke exposure. At baseline, participating firefighters underwent blood collection, pulmonary function testing, and sputum induction through inhalation of nebulized hypertonic saline. Study participants later performed overhaul of a structural fire, during which time they wore cartridge respirators and were monitored for smoke exposure. Overhaul involves searching for and extinguishing hidden sources of combustion. One hour following overhaul, blood, pulmonary function data, and induced sputum were again collected. IL-10, IL-8, and TNF-alpha concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in sputum supernatant. In 17 firefighters, baseline sputum IL-10 concentrations were 57.0+/-56.8 pg/L, and declined to 16.9+/-27. 2 pg/L following overhaul (p=.02). No significant changes were observed in sputum IL-8 and TNF-alpha concentrations. Forced vital capacity (FVC) declined significantly in study participants following overhaul. Serum concentrations of Clara-cell protein and surfactant-associated protein A increased significantly following overhaul, indicating increased lung permeability. IL-10 concentrations appear to be exquisitely sensitive to smoke, and studies of IL-10 in sputum should control for recent exposure. Reduced suppression of inflammation by IL-10 may be a mechanism by which low-level smoke exposure causes lung injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据