4.6 Article

Role of NRF2 in protection against hyperoxic lung injury in mice

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.2.4501

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-44530] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-57142, HL-58122, HL-66109] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-08319, ES-09606] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NRF2 is a transcription factor important in the protection against carcinogenesis and oxidative stress through antioxidant response element (ARE)-mediated transcriptional activation of several phase 2 detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes. This study was designed to determine the role of NRF2 in the pathogenesis of hyperoxic lung injury by comparing pulmonary responses to 95-98% oxygen between mice with site-directed mutation of the gene for NRF2 (Nrf2(-/-)) and wildtype mice (Nrf2(+/+)). Pulmonary hyperpermeability, macrophage inflammation, and epithelial injury in Nrf2(-/-) mice were 7.6-fold, 47%, and 43% greater, respectively, compared with Nrf2(+/+) mice after 72 h hyperoxia exposure. Hyperoxia markedly elevated the expression of NRF2 mRNA and DNA-binding activity of NRF2 in the lungs of Nrf2(+/+) mice. mRNA expression for ARE-responsive lung antioxidant and phase 2 enzymes was evaluated in both genotypes of mice to identify potential downstream molecular mechanisms of NRF2 in hyperoxic lung responses. Hyperoxia-induced mRNA levels of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-Ya and -Yc subunits, UDP glycosyl transferase (UGT), glutathione peroxidase-2 (GPx2), and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) were significantly lower in Nrf2(-/-) mice compared with Ntf2(+/+) mice. Consistent with differential mRNA expression, NQO1 and total GST activities were significantly lower in Nrf2(-/-) mice compared with Nrf2(+/+) mice after hyperoxia. Results demonstrated that NRF2 has a significant protective role against pulmonary hyperoxic injury in mice, possibly through transcriptional activation of lung antioxidant defense enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据