4.6 Article

A hydrogenosomal [Fe]-hydrogenase from the anaerobic chytrid Neocallimastix sp L2

期刊

GENE
卷 284, 期 1-2, 页码 103-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00388-8

关键词

[Fe]-hydrogenase; chytrid; hydrogenosome; evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of a [Fe]-hydrogenase in the hydrogenosomes of the anaerobic chytridiomycete fungus Neocallimastix sp. L2 has been demonstrated by immunocytochemistry, subcellular fractionation, Western-blotting, and measurements of hydrogenase activity in the presence of various concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO). Since the hydrogenosomal hydrogenase activity can be inhibited nearly completely by low concentrations of CO, it is likely that the [Fe]-hydrogenase is responsible for at least 90% of the hydrogen production in isolated hydrogenosomes. Most likely, this hydrogenase is encoded by the gene hydL2 that exhibits all the motifs that are characteristic of [Fe]-hydrogenases. The open reading frame starts with an N-terminal extension of 38 amino acids that has the potential to function as a hydrogenosomal targeting signal. The downstream sequences encode an enzyme of a calculated molecular mass of 66.4 kDa that perfectly matches the molecular mass of the mature hydrogenase in the hydrogenosome. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the hydrogenase of Neocallimastix sp. L2. clusters together with similar ('long-type') [Fe]-hydrogenases from Trichomonas vaginalis, Nyctotherus ovalis, Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Thermotoga maritima. Phylogenetic analysis based on the H-cluster-the only module of [Fe]-hydrogenases that is shared by all types of [Fe]-hydrogenases and hydrogenase-like proteins-revealed a monophyly of all hydrogenase-like proteins of the aerobic eukaryotes. Our analysis suggests that the evolution of the various [Fe]-hydrogenases and hydrogenase-like proteins occurred by a differential loss of Fe-S clusters in the N-terminal part of the [Fe]-hydrogenase. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据