4.7 Article

Early loss of thrombomodulin expression impairs vein graft thromboresistance - Implications for vein graft failure

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 205-212

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hh0202.105097

关键词

thrombomodulin; thrombosis; vein grafts; gene therapy

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-10250-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thrombosis is the major cause of early vein graft failure. Our aim was to determine whether alterations in the expression of the anticoagulant proteins, thrombomodulin (TM) and the endothelial cell protein C receptor (EPCR), impair endothelial thromboresistance that may contribute to vein graft failure. Immunohistochemical staining of autologous rabbit vein graft sections revealed that the expression of TM, but not EPCR, was reduced significantly early after graft implantation. Western blot analysis revealed that TM expression was reduced by >95% during the first 2 weeks after implantation, with gradual but incomplete recovery by 42 days. This resulted in up to a 95% reduction in the capacity of the grafts to activate protein C and was associated with an increase in bound thrombin activity, which peaked on day 7 at 28.7 +/- 3.8 mU/cm(2) and remained elevated for more than 14 days. Restoration of TM expression using adenovirus vector-mediated gene transfer significantly enhanced the capacity of grafts to activate protein C and reduced bound thrombin activity on day 7 to levels comparable to that of normal veins (5.7 +/-0.4 versus 5.2 +/- 1.1 mU/cm(2), respectively, P=0.74). Surprisingly, neointima formation was not affected by this inhibition of local thrombin activity. These data suggest that the early loss of TM expression significantly impairs vein graft thromboresistance and results in enhanced local thrombin generation. Although enhanced local thrombin generation may predispose to early vein graft failure due to thrombosis, it does not seem to contribute significantly to late vein graft failure due to neointimal hyperplasia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据