4.7 Article

Characterization of two highly similar Rad51 homologs of Physcomitrella patens

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 316, 期 1, 页码 35-49

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5336

关键词

DNA recombination; DNA repair; RecA; ATPases; strand exchange

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The moss Physcomitrella patens, which is a land plant with efficient homologous recombination, encodes two Rad51 proteins PpaRad51.1 and PpaRad51.2). The PpaRad51.1 and PpaRad51.2 proteins, which share 94% identity between them, interact with themselves and with each other. Both proteins bind ssDNA and dsDNA in a Mg2+ and pH-dependent manner, with a stoichiometry of similar toone PpaRad51.1 monomer per 3(+/-1) nt or bp and one PpaRad51.2 monomer per 1(+/-0.5) nt or bp, respectively. At neutral pH, a 1.6-fold excess of both proteins is required for ssDNA and dsDNA binding. PpaRad51.1 and PpaRad51.2 show ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity and efficiently promote strand annealing in a nucleotide-independent but in a Mg2+-depenclent manner. Both proteins promote joint-molecule formation, DNA strand invasion and are able to catalyse strand exchange in the presence of Mg2+ and ATP. No further increase in the activities is observed when both proteins are present in the same reaction. None of the PpaRad51 gene products complement the DNA repair and recombination phenotype of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad51Delta mutants. However, PpaRad51.1 confers a dominant-negative DNA repair phenotype, and both PpaRad51 proteins reduce the levels of double-strand break-induced recombination when overexpressed in S. cerevisiae wt cells. These results suggest that both PpaRad51 proteins are bona fide Rad51 proteins that may contribute, in a different manner, to homologous recombination, and that they might replace ScRad51 in a hypothetical yeast protein complex inactivating different functions required for recombinational repair. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据