4.8 Article

Altered expression of ADAMS (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase) in fibrillating human atria

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 105, 期 6, 页码 720-725

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc0602.103639

关键词

metalloproteinases; fibrillation; pathology; remodeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-ADAMS (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase) are ectoproteases that have recently been reported to be expressed in cardiac tissue. Although they are known to regulate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, their pathophysiological role in various cardiac diseases is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether structural remodeling of the atria during atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with altered ADAM expression. Methods and Results-Atrial tissue samples of 30 patients undergoing open-heart surgery were examined. Fifteen patients had persistent AF (greater than or equal to6 months), and the remaining 15 patients had no history of AF. ADAM9, ADAM 10, and ADAM 15 expression was analyzed quantitatively at the mRNA and protein levels. ADAM expression was localized by immunohistochemistry. ADAM expression was correlated with amounts of integrins beta(1) and beta(3). The amount of ADAM10 protein more than doubled during AF (82 +/- 15 versus 36 +/- 8 U; P<0.01). Amounts of ADAM15 protein (102 +/- 12 versus 40 +/- 6 U; P<0.01) and mRNA (24.0 +/- 5.6 versus 10.5 +/- 2.5 U: P<0.05) increased significantly during AF compared with sinus rhythm. ADAM9 protein was not detected in any sample. ADAM/integrin ratios showed an increase of 4- to 6-fold (P<0.05) in patients with AF who had significantly dilated atria (4.94 +/- 0.6 versus 4.3 +/- 0.7 cm; P<0.05). ADAM/integrin ratios correlated with atrial diameter. Conclusions-AF is associated with an increase in the expression of ADAM10 and ADAM15. Enhanced ADAM-dependent disintegrin and metalloproteinase activity may be a molecular mechanism that contributes to the dilation of fibrillating human atria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据