4.4 Article

Single oral immunization with replication deficient recombinant adenovirus elicits long-lived transgene-specific cellular and humoral immune responses

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 293, 期 2, 页码 210-216

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2001.1281

关键词

oral immunization; replication deficient adenovirus; antibody; CTL

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral-gastric delivery of vaccines is a preferred route of immunization and is particularly relevant to the development of vaccine-vector systems. We have investigated the ability of a replication deficient (E1-deleted) adenovirus construct (RAd68), which efficiently expresses the measles virus nucleocapsid (N) protein under the control of the strong HCMV IE promoter, to elicit antibody and cytotoxic T cell (CTL) responses in mice following intragastric administration. Measles virus N protein-specific CTL memory and serum antibody responses were analyzed in a total of 140 mice at time points 2-51 weeks after immunization either with a single dose of 10(8) pfu RAd68 or with a fivefold higher dose. Of the 20 animals analyzed in the first 4-week period following low-dose immunization, 6 mounted low-level splenic CTL responses while 13 animals had CTL in the mesenteric lymph nodes. Splenic CTL responses were largely undetectable at later times, Only 23% of low-dose-immunized mice made serum antibody responses and these were generally of low magnitude and frequently of short duration. In contrast, the majority of animals immunized orally with 5 X 10(8) pfu RAd68 mounted splenic CTL responses (70%) and/or antibody responses (89%). Notably, these responses were stronger and of greater duration than those seen following immunization at the lower dose. Gut mucosal immunization with replication deficient adenoviruses is a promising approach, not only for the development of complementary measles vaccine strategies which may be required for measles virus eradication, but also generally for vaccination against other infections. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据