4.7 Article

Frequent mutations in the ligand-binding domain of PML-RARα after multiple relapses of acute promyeloicytic leukemia:: Analysis for functional relationship to response to all-trans retinoic acid and histone deacetylase inhibitors in vitro and in vivo

期刊

BLOOD
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 1356-1363

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V99.4.1356

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA56771, CA73136] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified missense mutations In the ligand binding domain of the oncoprotein PML-RARalpha in 5 of 8 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with 2 or more relapses and 2 or more previous courses of all-trans retinoic acid (RA)containing therapy. Four mutations were novel (Lys207Asn, Gly289Arg, Arg294Trp, and Pro407Ser), whereas one had been previously identified (Arg272Gln; normal RARalpha1 codon assignment). Five patients were treated with repeat RA plus phenylbutyrate (PB), a histone deacetylase Inhibitor, and one patient experienced a prolonged clinical remission. Of the 5 RA + PB-treated patients, 4 had PML-RARalpha mutations. The Gly289Arg mutation In the clinical responder produced the most defective PML-RARalpha function In the presence of RA with or without sodium butyrate (NaB) or trichostatin A. Relapse APL cells from this patient failed to differentiate In response to RA but partially differentiated in response to NaB alone, which was augmented by RA. In contrast, NaB alone had no differentiation effect on APL cells from another mutant case (Pro407Ser) but enhanced differentiation induced by RA. These results Indicate that PML-RARalpha mutations occurred with high frequency after multiple RA treatment relapses, Indicate that the functional potential of PML-RARalpha was not correlated with clinical response to RA + PB treatment, and suggest that the response to RA + PB therapy In one patient was related to the ability of PB to circumvent the blocked RA-regulated gene response pathway. (C) 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据