4.8 Article

Supramolecular organization of α,α′-disubstituted sexithiophenes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 124, 期 7, 页码 1269-1275

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0113403

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The self-assembly of alpha,alpha'-linked sexithiophenes with chiral and achiral penta(ethylene glycol) chains attached at the alpha- positions of the terminal rings, that is, 2,2':5',2:5,2'''',2'''':5'''',2'''''- sexithiophene-5,5'''''-dicarboxylic acid- (2S)-2-methyl-3,6,9,12,15-pentaoxahexadecyl ester (1) and 2,2':5',2:5,2''':5',2'''':5''''m2'''''-sexithiophene-5,5'''''-dicarboxylic acid-3,6,9,1 2,15-pentaoxahexadecyl ester (2), respectively is described. Analysis of the UV/vis, fluorescence, circular dichroism, and circular polarization of luminescence spectroscopic data shows that these compounds form chiral aggregates in polar solvents and in the solid state. In n-butanol aggregation occurs at temperatures below 30 degreesC, while above this threshold temperature the aggregates break up without an intermediate disordered state of aggregation, and the compounds are molecularly dissolved. The melting temperature of the aggregates depends on the concentration of sexithiophene, indicating that the optical changes observed are a result of intermolecular processes. Mass spectrometric measurements reveal that 1 and 2 can form mixed aggregates. Analysis of the optical spectra reveals that in these mixed aggregates, chiral 1 molecules act as sergeants to direct the packing of the soldiers 2, illustrating cooperativity within the columns. In water, the same type of chiral aggregates are formed as in n-butanol below 30 degreesC; however, these aggregates are still present, but the chirality is lost above 30 degreesC. In spin-coated films of 1 chiral aggregates are present. AFM studies show that 1 self-organizes into chiral fiberlike structures in the solid state. Furthermore both 1 and 2 display thermotropic liquid crystalline behavior between 180 and 200 degreesC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据