4.5 Article

Pin1 modulates the dephosphorylation of the RNA polymerase IIC-terminal domain by yeast Fcp1

期刊

FEBS LETTERS
卷 513, 期 2-3, 页码 305-311

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02288-3

关键词

CTD; dephosphorylation; phosphorylation; Pin1; PPIase; RNA polymerase II

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG17870] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM58556, R01GM56230] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reversible phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues N-terminal to proline (pSer/Thr-Pro) is an important signaling mechanism in the cell. The pSer/Thr-Pro moiety exists in the two distinct cis and trans conformations, whose conversion is catalyzed by the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) Pin1. Among others, Pin1 binds to the phosphorylated C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of the RNA polymerase 11, but the biochemical and functional relevance of this interaction is unknown. Here we confirm that the CTD phosphatase Fcp1 can suppress a Pin1 mutation in yeast. Furthermore, this genetic interaction requires the phosphatase domain as well as the BRCT domain of Fcp1, suggesting a critical role of the Fcp1 localization. Based on these observations, we developed a new in vitro assay to analyze the CTD dephosphorylation by Fcp1 that uses only recombinant proteins and mimics the in vivo situation. This assay allows us to present strong evidence that Pin1 is able to stimulate CTD dephosphorylation by Fcp1 in vitro, and that this stimulation depends on Pin1's PPIase activity. Finally, Pin1 significantly increased the dephosphorylation of the CTD on the Ser(5)-Pro motif, but not on Ser(2)-Pro in yeast, which can be explained with Pin1's substrate specificity. Together, our results indicate a new role for Pin1 in the regulation of CTD phosphorylation and present a further example for prolyl isomerization-dependent protein dephosphorylation. (C) 2002 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据