4.5 Article

Synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging evidence of biogenic mercury identified in a burial in colonial Antigua

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 26-30

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.03.006

关键词

Synchrotron; Bone; Trace elements

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. National Research Council Canada
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Province of Saskatchewan
  5. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  6. University of Saskatchewan
  7. US Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences
  8. NSERC
  9. University of Washington
  10. Canadian Light Source
  11. Advanced Photon Source
  12. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  13. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  14. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]
  15. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR001209]
  16. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Development Grant [430-2012-0236]
  17. Canada Research Chairs
  18. NSERC (Canada)
  19. SHRF
  20. CIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mass spectroscopic analysis of bone samples from 17 individuals once buried in a Royal Naval Hospital cemetery (1793-1822) in Antigua revealed a high level of mercury (Hg) in one individual. While the toxic properties of Hg are now recognized, this metal was used for centuries to treat ailments such as syphilis and yellow fever. Synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence imaging (XFI) was employed to determine whether the Hg was present in the bone as a result of environmental contamination or due to biogenic uptake. The XFI study revealed that only a localized subset of the osteons within a 2.5 mm by 1.5 mm scan contained Hg - a finding consistent with biogenic uptake. The near-edge portion of the X-ray absorption spectrum was used to determine that the Hg was present in the bone tissue as an inorganic mercuric sulfide. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据