4.7 Article

The mass function of an X-ray flux-limited sample of galaxy clusters

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 567, 期 2, 页码 716-740

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/338753

关键词

cosmological parameters; cosmology : observations; galaxies : clusters : general; intergalactic medium; large-scale structure of universe; X-rays : galaxies : clusters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new X-ray-selected and X-ray flux-limited galaxy cluster sample is presented. Based on the ROSAT All-Sky Survey, the 63 brightest clusters with galactic latitude \b(II)\ greater than or equal to 20degrees and flux f(x)(0.1-2.4 keV) greater than or equal to 2 x 10(-11) ergs s(-1) cm(-2) have been compiled. Gravitational masses have been determined utilizing intracluster gas density profiles, derived mainly from ROSAT PSPC pointed observations, and gas temperatures, as published mainly from ASCA observations, assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. This sample and an extended sample of 106 galaxy clusters is used to establish the X-ray luminosity-gravitational mass relation. From the complete sample the galaxy cluster mass function is determined and used to constrain the mean cosmic matter density and the amplitude of mass fluctuations. Comparison to Press-Schechter type model mass functions in the framework of cold dark matter cosmological models and a Harrison-Zeldovich initial density fluctuation spectrum yields the constraints Omega(m) = 0.12(-0.04)(+0.06) and sigma(8) = 0.96(-0.12)(+0.15) (90% c.l.). Various possible systematic uncertainties are quantified. Adding all identified systematic uncertainties to the statistical uncertainty in a worst-case fashion results in an upper limit Omega(m) < 0.31. For comparison to previous results a relation sigma(8) = 0.43 Omega(-0.38)(m) is derived. The mass function is integrated to show that the contribution of mass bound within virialized cluster regions to the total matter density is small; i.e., Omega(cluster) = 0.012(-0.004)(+0.003) for cluster masses larger than 6.4(-0.6)(+0.7) x 10(13) h(50)(-1) M..

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据