4.4 Article

Association of fibrinogen and lipoprotein(a) as a coronary heart disease risk factor in men (The Quebec cardiovascular study)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 662-666

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02336-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibrinogen has been prospectively found to correlate with coronary heart disease (CHD) but a similar association has not been well established for lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). Plasma lipids, Lp(a), and fibrinogen levels were measured in 2,125 men (aged 47 to 76 years) who were free of clinical CHD. During a 5-year follow-up period, 116 first CHD events were documented. Men with CHD were older, smoked more, had a higher prevalence of diabetes, and higher levels of systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Lp(a), and fibrinogen, and lower plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Only fibrinogen levels in the upper tertile of the distribution compared with the lower tertiles were associated with a significant risk of CHD (adjusted risk ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.4 to 4.2; p = 0.0010). Such an association was not observed with Lp(a). To assess a possible relation between fibrinogen and Lp(a) to the risk of CHD events, men were assigned to 1 of 4 groups according to fibrinogen median levels and a Lp(a) cut-off level of 300 mg/L: group 1: fibrinogen <4.05 g/L and Lp(a) <300 mg/L; group 2: fibrinogen <4.05 g/L and Lp(a) greater than or equal to300 mg/L; group 3: fibrinogen greater than or equal to4.05 g/L and Lp(a) <300 mg/L; and group 4: fibrinogen greater than or equal to4.05 g/L and Lp(a) greater than or equal to300 mg/L. Using group 1 as a reference, a significant risk ratio was only documented in group 4 (2.5; 95% Cl 1.2 to 5.1; p = 0.0132). In this population, high fibrinogen levels associated with high Lp(a) levels significantly increased the risk of CHD. (C) 2002 by Excerpta Medical, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据