4.5 Article

Dual action of estrogen on glutamate-induced calcium signaling: mechanisms requiring interaction between estrogen receptors and src/mitogen activated protein kinase pathway

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 930, 期 1-2, 页码 216-234

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02254-0

关键词

estrogen; calcium; neuroprotection; kinase; glutamate

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [2T32 AG 00093-16, P01 AG 1475] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) is the most widely prescribed pharmaceutical estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) for postmenopausal women in the United States and is the ERT of the Women's Health Initiative. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that CEE exerts neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects in neurons involved in learning and memory, and which are affected in Alzheimer's disease. The present work demonstrates that CEE potentiated the rise in intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]) following exposure to physiological concentrations of glutamate. In contrast, the reverse effect occurred in the presence of excitotoxic levels of glutamate exposure, where CEE attenuated the rise in [Ca2+](i). Potentiation of the glutamate response was mediated by the NMDA receptor, as the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 blocked the CEE-induced potentiation, whereas the L-type calcium channel blocker nifedipine did not. Further, the CEE-potentiated glutamate response was mediated by a src tyrosine kinase, as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor PP2 blocked the potentiation induced by CEE and neurons treated with CEE displayed increased phosphorylated tyrosine. The inhibition by CEE of [Ca2+](i) rise in the presence of excitotoxic levels of glutamate was mediated by mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), as the protective effect of CEE was blocked by inhibiting MAPK activation with PD98059. These data provide potential mechanisms to explain the cognitive enhancing and neuroprotective effects exerted by ERT. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据