4.6 Article

A differential role for the mitogen-activated protein kinases in lipopolysaccharide signaling - The MEK/ERK pathway is not essential for nitric oxide and interleukin 10 production

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 11, 页码 9077-9087

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M104385200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA47881, F32 CA81733] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56396] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI34891] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM53271, T32-GM08349] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) is a component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and promotes the activation of macrophages and microglia. Although these cells are highly LPS-responsive, they serve unique tissue-specific functions and exhibit different LPS sensitivities. Accordingly, it was of interest to evaluate whether these biological differences reside in variations within LPS signaling pathways between these two cell types. Because the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 have been implicated in the control of many immune responses, we tested the concept that they are a key indicator for differences in cellular LPS sensitivity. We observed that murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and murine BV-2 microglial cells both respond to LPS by exhibiting increased IkappaBalpha degradation, enhanced NF-kappaB DNA binding activity, and elevated nitric oxide and interleukin-1beta production. Although LPS potently stimulates ERK activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages, it does not activate ERK-1/-2 in BV-2 microglia. Moreover, antagonism of the MEK/ERK pathway potentiates LPS-stimulated nitric oxide production, suggesting that LPS-stimulated ERK activation can exert inhibitory effects in macrophage-like cells. These data support the idea that ERK activation is not a required function of LPS-mediated signaling events and illustrate that alternative/additional pathways for LPS action exist in these cell types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据