4.5 Article

The ratio between tetrahydrobiopterin and oxidized tetrahydrobiopterin analogues controls superoxide release from endothelial nitric oxide synthase:: an EPR spin trapping study

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 733-739

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/0264-6021:3620733

关键词

L-arginine; 7,8-dihydrobiopterin; electron paramagnetic resonance

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 52419] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Augmentation of superoxide levels has been linked to impaired relaxation in hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia. Purified endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) generates superoxide under limited availability of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). Thus alterations in endothelial BH4 levels have been postulated to stimulate superoxide production from eNOS. This possibility was examined by determining the concentration-dependent effects of BH4. and its analogues, on superoxide formation by eNOS. Superoxide was quantified by EPR spin trapping, which is the only available technique to quantify superoxide from eNOS. Using 5-ethoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-pyrroline N-oxide, we show that only fully reduced BH4 diminished superoxide release from eNOS, with efficiency BH4 > 6-methyl-BH4 > 5-methyl-BH4. In contrast, partially oxidized BH4 analogues, 7,8-dihydrobiopterin (7,8-BH2) and sepiapterin had no effect. Neither L-arginine nor N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) abolished superoxide formation. Together, BH4 and L-arginine stimulated (NO)-N-. production at maximal rates of 148 nmol/min per mg of protein. These results indicate that BH4 acts as a 'redox switch'. decreasing superoxide release and enhancing (NO)-N-. formation. This role was verified by adding 7,8-BH2 or sepiapterin to fully active eNOS. Both 7,8-BH2 and sepiapterin enhanced superoxide release while inhibiting (NO)-N-. formation. Collectively, these results indicate that the ratio between oxidized and reduced BH4 metabolites tightly regulates superoxide formation from eNOS. The pathological significance of this scenario is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据