4.2 Article

A Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formula

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS A
卷 700, 期 1-2, 页码 142-156

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01316-1

关键词

nuclear structure; binding energies and masses; Hartree-Fock

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to have more reliable predictions of nuclear masses at the neutron drip line, we here go beyond the recent mass formula HFBCS-1 and present a new mass formula, HFB-1, based on the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method. As with the HFBCS-1 mass formula, we use a 10-parameter Skyrme force along with a 4-parameter delta-function pairing force and a 2-parameter phenomenological Wigner term. However, with the original HFBCS-1 Skyrme force (MSk7). the rms error becomes unacceptably large and a new force fit is required. With the isoscalar and isovector effective masses constrained to be equal, the remaining 15 degrees of freedom are fitted to the masses of all the 1754 measured nuclei with A greater than or equal to 16, \N - Z\ > 2 given in the 1995 Audi-Wapstra compilation. The rms error with respect to the masses of all the 1888 measured nuclei with Z. N greater than or equal to 8 is 0.764 MeV. A complete mass table, HFB-1 (available on the Web), has been constructed. giving all nuclei lying between the two drip lines over the range Z, N greater than or equal to 8 and Z less than or equal to 120. A comparison between HFB-1 and HFBCS-1 mass tables shows that the HFBCS model is a very good approximation of the HFB theory, in particular for masses, the extrapolated masses never differing by more than 2 MeV below Z less than or equal to 110. We also find that the behaviour of shell gaps far away from the region of beta stability does not depend on whether the HFBCS or HFB methods are used, in particular, no quenching of astrophysical interest arises from replacing the BCS method by the Bogoliubov method. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据