4.7 Article

Larvicidal activity of isobutylamides identified in piper nigrum fruits against three mosquito species

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 7, 页码 1866-1870

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf011457a

关键词

natural insecticides; mosquito larvicides; mosquito; Piper nigrum; isobutylamide; pipercide; retrofractemide A

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insecticidal activity of materials derived from the fruits of Piper nigrum against third instar larvae of Culex pipiens pallens, Aedes aegypti, and A. togoi was examined and compared with that of commercially available piperine, a known insecticidal compound from Piper species. The biologically active constituents of P. nigrum fruits were characterized as the isobutylamide alkaloids pellitorine, guineensine, pipercide, and retrofractamide, A by spectroscopic analysis. Retrofractamide A was isolated from P. nigrum fruits as a new insecticidal principle. On the basis of 48-h LC50 values, the compound most toxic to C. pipiens pallens larvae was pipercide (0.004 ppm) followed by retrofractamide A (0.028 ppm), guineensine (0.17 ppm), and pellitorine (0.86 ppm). Piperine (3.21 ppm) was least toxic. Against A. aegypti larvae, larvicidal activity was more pronounced in retrofractamide A (0.039 ppm) than in pipercide (0.1 ppm), guineensine (0.89 ppm), and pellitorine (0.92 ppm). Piperine (5.1 ppm) was relatively ineffective. Against A. togoi larvae, retrofractamide A (0.01 ppm) was much more effective, compared with pipercide (0.26 ppm), pellitorine (0.71 ppm), and guineensine (0.75 ppm). Again, very low activity was observed with piperine (4.6 ppm). Structure-activity relationships indicate that the N-isobutylamine moiety might play a crucial role in the larvicidal activity, but the methylenedioxyphenyl moiety does not appear essential for toxicity. Naturally occurring Piper fruit-derived compounds merit further study as potential mosquito larval control agents or as lead compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据