4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Chronic hypoxia alters the physiological and morphological trajectories of developing chicken embryos

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00009-0

关键词

hypoxia; metabolic rate; development; heart mass; body mass; hematocrit; hemoglobin; trajectories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chicken embryos were chronically exposed to hypoxia (P-o2 similar to 110 mmHg) during development, and assessed for detrimental metabolic and morphological effects. Eggs were incubated in one of four groups: control (i.e. 151 mmHg), or treated with continuous 110 mmHg (15% O-2) during days 1-6 (H1-6), 6-12 (H6-12), or 12-18 (H12-18) with normoxia during the remaining incubation. Metabolism (V-o2), body mass, hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) were measured in embryos on days 12 and 18 of incubation and in day-old hatchlings. Ability to maintain V-o2 was acutely measured during a step-wise decrease in P-o2 from normoxia to hypoxia (55 mmHg). On day 12, V-o2 of H1-6 eggs were significantly lower than in the control and H6-12 eggs. P-crit in H6-12 eggs was lower than in control and H1-6 eggs. Body mass of H1-6 and H6-12 embryos on day 1 2 was significantly lower than in control embryos, while in H6-12 embryos, Hct and Hb were higher. On day 18, H6-12 embryos had significantly lower V-o2 than control eggs. Body mass of H6-12 and H12-18 embryos was significantly lower than control embryos. Hct and Hb did not differ between treatments. In hatchlings, mass, Hb and Hct had returned to values statistically identical to controls. However., H6-12 embryos had significantly lower V-o2. Long-term hypoxia altered V-o2 when hypoxic incubation occurred during the middle third of incubation, but not during earlier or later incubation. Thus, chronic hypoxic exposure during critical periods in development altered the developmental physiological trajectories and modified the phenotypes of the developing embryos. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据