4.6 Article

Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 538-542

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02669.x

关键词

prostatic neoplasms; pathology; classification; prostatectomy; male; human

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer. Patients and methods A consecutive series of 305 men with prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection (1975-1990) and with no curative treatment was analysed. There was no assessment of prostate-specific antigen level during this period. The mean (range age at diagnosis was 73.7 (52-95) years and the mean follow-up was 6.4 (0-22) years. The influence of Gleason score and the percentage of the specimen area with tumour 6 cancer) on disease-specific survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results Of 305 cancers, 22% had a Gleason score of 4-5, 29% of 6, 18% of 7 and 32% of 8-10. At the follow-up. 89% of the men had died, of whom 42% had died from prostate cancer. The disease-specific 10-year survival was 56%. The disease-specific mean survival ( DSMS) for Gleason score 4-5, 6, 7 and 8-10 was 20, 16, 10 and 5 years, respectively (P<0.001). The DSMS did not differ significantly between Gleason 4 and 5 or between 8-10. There was a trend towards shorter survival for Gleason 4 + 3 = 7 (DSMS 9 years) than GS 3 + 4 = 7 (DSMS 13 years: P = 0.16). Gleason score and % cancer were independent predictors of DSMS (P<0.001). Conclusion The long-term prognosis of prostate cancer oil deferred treatment is predicted well by the Gleason score. Four prognostic categories of prostate cancer are suggested, i.e. Gleason score 4-5, 6, 7 and 8-10.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据