4.7 Article

Porosity development in activated carbons obtained from date pits under chemical activation with phosphoric acid

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 105-117

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1387-1811(01)00481-4

关键词

porosity; activated carbon; date pits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Date pits, a low-cost agricultural by-product, was tested as a precursor for the production of porous carbons in a chemical scheme using phosphoric acid. The raw material was impregnated with increasing concentrations of H3PO4 (30-70 vol.%) followed by pyrolysis at 300, 500 or 700 degreesC. Texture characteristics of the products were determined by adsorption of N-2 at 77 K, as well as iodine, phenol, and methylene blue values. Carbons obtained at 300 degreesC were very poorly porous, although with anomalously high capacity for the uptake of probe molecules from solution. This was attributed to the contribution of unsaturated chemical bonds initiated in the partially decomposed material. Carbons obtained at 500 and 700 degreesC are good to excellent adsorbents and attain best developed porosity at 700 degreesC, contrary to the earlier well-established temperature of 500 degreesC recommended for treatment of agricultural precursors. Thermogravimetric/differential thermogravimetric tracings of the H3PO4-impregnated date pits indicated a delayed-decomposition effect shifted to higher temperature as compared to the raw material. Phosphoric acid is suggested to inflict physical and chemical modifications on the botanical structure by penetration, particle swelling, partial dissolution of the biomass, bond cleavage and reformation of new polymeric structures resistant to thermal decomposition. In addition, raw date pits are proposed to be composed of a low-porosity and compact cellular structure that needs higher acid concentrations and/or temperatures to attain the optimum effect normally reached at lower temperature in case of other feedstocks of botanical origin. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据