4.7 Article

Quantitative expansion of structural genomic alterations in the spectrum of neuroendocrine lung carcinomas

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 196, 期 4, 页码 408-415

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/path.1065

关键词

lung; neuroendocrine carcinoma; fluorescence in situ hybridization; immunohistochemistry; genomic alterations; oncogenes; tumour suppressor genes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathogenesis and interrelationships of neuroendocrine lung carcinomas are not well understood. Tissue macro-arrays prepared from surgical resection specimens from 35 patients with typical carcinoid (TC), six with atypical carcinoid (AC), 13 with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and 15 with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and inummohistochemistry. Hybridizations with locusspecific DNA probes demonstrated a high incidence of deletion for the tumour suppressor genes p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb), and for the oncogene cyclin D1, comparable in all carcinoma types. Similarly, an increase of DNA copy number for the Her-2/neu and c-myc oncogenes was noted in all neoplasms. A more detailed quantitative analysis of the results, however, demonstrated increasing numbers of cells harbouring these genomic alterations, from low-grade TC to highly malignant SCLC, with the exception of cyclin D1 deletion. Mutations of the p53 and Rb genes, as assayed by immunohistochemical studies, were observed at high incidence in high-grade carcinomas, compared with a low incidence in the low-grade carcinomas. Conversely, in all carcinoma types, neither membrane-bound Her-2/neu nor nuclear cyclin D1 was detected. It is concluded that structural genomic alterations are frequent in neuroendocrine lung carcinomas and that their occurrence may be underestimated by immunohistochemical studies alone. The quantitative expansion of the Rb, p53, c-myc, and Her-2/neu alterations towards high-grade carcinomas suggests common pathogenetic mechanisms in the spectrum of these neoplasms. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据