4.2 Article

Decreasing length of maternal hospital stay is not associated with increased readmission rates

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00882.x

关键词

length of stay; patient readmission; data linkage; parturition; international classification of diseases

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Capacity Building Grant [573122]
  2. NHMRC Capacity Building Grant [573122]
  3. NHMRC Project Grant [512162]
  4. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate changes in maternal length of postnatal stay by mode of birth and hospital type, and examine concurrent maternal readmission rates and reasons for readmission. Methods: Linked birth and hospital separation data were used to investigated mothers birth admissions (n=597,475) and readmissions (n=19,094) in the six weeks post-birth in New South Wales, 20012007. Outcomes were postnatal length of stay (mean days) and rate of readmission per 100 deliveries. Poisson regression was used to investigate annual readmission rates and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare length of readmission stays. Results: The overall mean postnatal length of stay declined from 3.7 days in 2001 to 3.4 days in 2007. Private hospitals had longer stays after Caesarean and vaginal deliveries, but mean length of stay fell for both private and public hospitals, and both modes of birth. The maternal readmission rate fell from 3.4% in 2001 to 3.0% in 2007. Leading primary diagnoses at readmission following vaginal birth were postpartum haemorrhage and breast/ lactation complications and following Caesarean section were wound complications and breast/ lactation complications. Conclusions: Despite the decrease in mean length of stay for birth admissions, there was no increase, and in fact a decrease, in the rate of postnatal readmissions. Implications: Current practices in hospital length of stay and care for women giving birth do not appear to be having serious adverse health effects as measured by readmissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据