4.3 Article

Tetrahydrobiopterin enhances forearm vascular response to acetylcholine in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 326-332

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(01)02317-2

关键词

tetrahydrobiopterin; nitric oxide; acetylcholine; endothelial function; essential hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A deficiency of tetrahydrobiopterin (1314,). an essential cofactor for nitric oxide (NO) synthase, decreases NO synthesis and increases superoxide production, Supplementation of BH, has been postulated to improve endothelial function in atherosclerotic Patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether BH, restores endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with essential hypertension. Methods: We evaluated the effects of BH, on forearm vascular responses to acetylcholine (ACh), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), an endothelium-independent vasodilator, both in patients with essential hypertension and in age- and sex-matched normal control subjects. Forearm blood flow (171317) was measured using strain gauge plethysmography. Results: The response of FBF to ACh was less in hypertensive patients (n = 8) than in normal control subjects (n = 8). There was no significant difference in FBF response to ISDN in the two groups. During coinfusion of BH4 (500 mg/min). the FBF response to ACh in hypertensive patients increased significantly (14.8 +/- 4.6 to 25.6 +/- 7.3 mL/min/100 mL tissue, P <.05) to the level of normal control Subjects, In the control subjects, also, BH4 augmented the FBF response to ACh (27.8 +/- 8.7 to 36.1 +/- 9.6 mL/min/100 mL tissue, P <.05). The increase in FBF after ISDN was not altered by BH, in either group (each group. n = 6). Conclusion: Supplementation of BH4, augments endothelium-dependent vasodilation in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. (C) 2002 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据