4.2 Article

The involvement of endogenous opioids and nitricoxidergic pathway in the anticonvulsant effects of foot-shock stress in mice

期刊

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 131-142

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-1211(02)00018-9

关键词

electroshock seizure threshold; foot-shock stress; maximal electroshock; nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase inhibitors; opioids; pentylenetetrazole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The involvement of endogenous opioids and nitric oxide (NO) in the anticonvulsant effects of stress against pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)- or electroconvulsive shock-induced seizures was assessed in mice. The prolonged and intermittent foot-shock stress, which induced opioid-mediated analgesia, had significant protective effects against both seizure types which was reversible by naloxone (0.3, 1 or 2 mg/kg), while brief and continuous foot-shock did not alter the seizure susceptibility. Pre-treatment with non-specific nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 1, 2, 5, 10 or 30 mg/kg), but not with specific inducible NOS (iNOS) inhibitor, aminoguanidine (50 or 100 mg/kg), blocked the stress-induced anticonvulsant effects. The lower doses of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) and L-NAME (2 mg/kg) showed additive effects in blocking the stress-induced anticonvulsant properties. L-arginine at a per se non-effective dose of 20 mg/kg potentiated the stress-induced anticonvulsant properties, an effect which was inhibited by L-NAME but not by aminoguanidine. Furthermore, a low dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) showed potentiation with stress in increasing PTZ seizure threshold. This potentiation was reversed by either naloxone or L-NAME at low doses but not by aminoguanidine. Taken together, these results show that NO synthesis, through constitutive but not iNOS, is involved in opioid-dependent stress-induced anticonvulsant effects against electrical and PTZ-induced convulsions. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据