4.5 Article

Analysis of inflammatory gene induction by oxidized phospholipids in vivo by quantitative real-time RT-PCR in comparison with effects of LPS

期刊

VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 219-227

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1537-1891(02)00172-6

关键词

oxidized phospholipids; inflammation; atherosclerosis; real-time RT-PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidized phospholipids are thought to play a role in the development of atherosclerosis and other chronic inflammatory processes. In this study, we analyzed the expression of inflammatory genes induced by oxidized L-alpha-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholin (OxPAPC) in vitro and in vivo using quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and monocyte-like U937 cells were treated with OxPAPC or lipopolysacchatide (LPS) for 3 h. For in vivo studies, OxPAPC or LPS was injected intravenously into female C57B1/6J mice and different tissues were isolated after 3 h. We found that both OxPAPC and LPS induced expression of early growth response factor 1 (EGR-1) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in HUVEC and of JE, the mouse homologue of MCP-1, in liver and heart, Interestingly, OxPAPC but not LPS increased expression of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) in U937 cells, HUVEC, aorta, heart, liver, and isolated blood cells. In contrast, E-selectin was selectively induced by LPS, but not by OxPAPC. Finally, OxPAPC-induced expression of HO-1 was blocked by a platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor antagonist. We conclude that oxidized phospholipids are biologically active in vivo and exert a specific response inducing a pattern of genes that is different from that induced by LPS. In addition, we demonstrate that the quantitative real-time RT-PCR technology is a proper tool to investigate differential inflammatory gene induction in vivo. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据