4.5 Article

Retroinfusion of NFKB decoy oligonucleotide extends cardioprotection achieved by CD18 inhibition in a preclinical study of myocardial ischemia and retroinfusion in pigs

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 518-526

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301673

关键词

leukocytes; adhesion; reperfusion injury; oligonucleotide transfection; liposomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myocardial reperfusion injury is partially mediated by postischemic inflammation. Beyond acute PMN recruitment, postischemic inflammation comprises subacute PMN adhesion, eg via NFkappaB activation. In a pig model of 60-min LAD occlusion by PTCA ballon inflation and 1 to 7 days of reperfusion, we investigated the impact of targeted NFkappaB decoy oligonucleotide (ODN) transfection in the area at risk (AAR) on intarct size and regional myocardial function. After 55 min of LAD occlusion, liposomes containing NFkappaB ODN were selectively retroinfused into the anterior interventricular vein for 5 min. Then, retroinfusion was stopped and reperfusion was initiated. Where indicated, CD18 antibody IB4 was infused systemically at 30 min of ischemia. Methylen blue and tetrazolium-red staining were used for quantification of the infarct size. Subendocardial segment shortening (SES) by sonomicrometric crystals in infarct area and AAR was assessed under pacing (expressed as % of control region). NFkappaB decoy ODN retroinfusion reduced intarct size (36 4% versus 49 +/- 5% in control hearts at day 7), whereas functional reserve of the AAR (SES 73 +/- 17% versus 46 +/- 18% at 180/min) tended to improve. Similar effects were observed after IB4 infusion (38 +/- 5% intarct size, 85 +/- 7% SES at 180/min). A combination of NFkappaB decoy ODN retroinfusion and IB4 infusion further decreased infarct size (26 +/- 2%) and improved functional reserve (SES 94 +/- 6% at 180/min). We conclude that NFkappaB decoy ODN transfection by retroinfusion is feasible in pig hearts and provides postischemic cardioprotection in addition to CD18 blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据