4.6 Article

Spleen is a primary site for activation of platelet-reactive T and B cells in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 168, 期 7, 页码 3675-3682

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3675

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have recently reported that in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (IMTP), circulating T and B Cells that are responsive to gpIIb-IIIa can induce anti-platelet autoantibody production. In this study, the frequencies and activation status of gpIIb-IIIa-reactive T and B cells were evaluated in the peripheral blood and spleen obtained from nine IMTP patients undergoing splenectomy. There was no difference in gpIIb-IIIa-reactive T cell frequencies between peripheral blood and spleen (6.4 +/- 2.6 vs 5.2 +/- 2.4 per 10(5) T cells), as determined by limiting dilution analysis, but activated T cells responsive to gpIIb-IIIa showing accelerated proliferation kinetics and those expressing CD154 were more frequent in spleen than in peripheral blood. The frequencies of anti-gpIIb-IIIa Ab-producing B cells, as determined by ELISPOT assay, were also similar in peripheral blood and spleen (61.2 +/- 24.0 vs 77.7 +/- 45.3 per 10(5) B cells); however, an anti-gpIIb-IIIa Ab was spontaneously produced by splenocytes in vitro, but scarcely secreted by PBMCs. CD19(-)/surface Ig(-)/CD38(+)/CD138(+) plasma cells secreting anti-gpIIb-IIIa Ab were exclusively detected in the spleen. In serial analysis, the frequencies of circulating gpIIb-IIIa-reactive T and B cells were markedly decreased after splenectomy in patients with a complete response, but were unchanged in nonresponders. These findings indicate that an interaction between gpIIb-IIIa-reactive T and B cells inducing anti-platelet Ab production in IMTP patients occurs primarily in the spleen and that the significant number of gpIIb-IIIa-reactive T and B cells activated in the spleen are released into the circulation as memory cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据