4.4 Article

A cell-centered database for electron tomographic data

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 138, 期 1-2, 页码 145-155

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00006-0

关键词

electron tomography; neuroinformatics; high-voltage electron microscopy; 3D reconstruction

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR08605, RR04050] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC03192] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM065937] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron tomography is providing a wealth of 3D structural data on biological components ranging from molecules to cells. We are developing a web-accessible database tailored to high-resolution cellular level structural and protein localization data derived from electron tomography. The Cell Centered Database or CCDB is built on an object-relational framework using Oracle 8i and is housed on a server at the San Diego Supercomputer Center at the University of California, San Diego. Data can be deposited and accessed via a web interface. Each volume reconstruction is stored with a full set of descriptors along with tilt images and any derived products such as segmented objects and animations. Tomographic data are supplemented by high-resolution light microscopic data in order to provide correlated data on higher-order cellular and tissue structure. Every object segmented from a reconstruction is included as a distinct entity in the database along with measurements such as volume, surface area, diameter, and length and amount of protein labeling, allowing the querying of image-specific attributes. Data sets obtained in response to a CCDB query are retrieved via the Storage Resource Broker, a data management system for transparent access to local and distributed data collections. The CCDB is designed to provide a resource for structural biologists and to make tomographic data sets available to the scientific community at large. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据