4.5 Article

Maturation of mismatch negativity in typically developing infants and preschool children

期刊

EAR AND HEARING
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 118-136

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200204000-00005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD 01799] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC00223] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: 1) To determine whether an adult-like mismatch negativity (NDU) can be reliably elicited in typically developing awake infants and preschool children, and if so 2) to examine whether maturational changes exist in MMN latency and amplitude. Design: Two experiments were designed to elicit MMN using an oddball paradigm. In Experiment 1, a 1000-Hz tone served as the standard stimulus and a 1200-Hz tone as the deviant. In Experiment 2, a 1000-Hz standard stimulus and a 2000-Hz deviant were presented. Infants' ages ranged from 2 to 47 and 3 to 44 mo in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Results: In Experiment 1, a negativity was not elicited in the majority of the infants and preschoolers tested. In Experiment 2, a negativity was reliably elicited in the infants and preschoolers across all ages. A significant negative correlation was observed between age and latency, but not for age and amplitude for this negativity. This negativity was found to decrease at a rate of 1 msec/mo. Infants younger than 12 mo of age showed a significantly larger positivity to the deviant than to the standard between 150-300 and 200-300 msec in Experiments I and 2, respectively. Conclusions: The discriminative processes indexed by ABIN in response to frequency changes are immature in infants and preschool children. Although there is convincing evidence that the negativity elicited in Experiment 2 is an immature MMN, the possibility that it may be an obligatory effect indexing recovery from refractoriness cannot be ruled out at this time. The results from these experiments suggest that the MMN; component has limited use as a clinical tool at this time for infants and young children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据