4.6 Article

Regional muscle and adipose tissue amino acid metabolism in lean and obese women

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00359.2001

关键词

obesity; stable isotope tracers; protein metabolism

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00954, RR00036] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56341, DK37948] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of obesity on regional skeletal muscle and adipose tissue amino acid metabolism is not known. We evaluated systemic and regional (forearm and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue) amino acid metabolism, by use of a combination of stable isotope tracer and arteriovenous balance methods, in five lean women [body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m(2)] and five women with abdominal obesity (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2); waist circumference >100 cm) who were matched on fat-free mass (FFM). All subjects were studied at 22 h of fasting to ensure that the subjects were in net protein breakdown during this early phase of starvation. Leucine rate of appearance in plasma (an index of whole body proteolysis), expressed per unit of FFM, was not significantly different between lean and obese groups (2.05 +/- 0.18 and 2.34 +/- 0.04 mumol.kg FFM-1 .min(-1), respectively). However, the rate of leucine release from forearm and adipose tissues in obese women (24.0 +/- 4.8 and 16.6 +/- 6.5 nmol.100 g(-1).min(-1), respectively) was lower than in lean women (66.8 +/- 10.6 and 38.6 +/- 7.0 nmol.100 g(-1).min(-1), respectively; P < 0.05). Approximately 5-10% of total whole body leucine release into plasma was derived from adipose tissue in lean and obese women. The results of this study demonstrate that the rate of release of amino acids per unit of forearm and adipose tissue at 22 h of fasting is lower in women with abdominal obesity than in lean women, which may help obese women decrease body protein losses during fasting. In addition, adipose tissue is a quantitatively important site for proteolysis in both lean and obese subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据