4.4 Article

Myelopoiesis in the omentum of normal mice and during abdominal inflammatory processes

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 308, 期 1, 页码 87-96

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-002-0550-y

关键词

omentum; milky spots; mesenterium; schistosomiasis; myelopoiesis; mouse (C3H/HeN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coelomic cavities are relatively isolated from the systemic circulation of blood cells. Resident cell populations have a proper phenotype and kinetics, maintaining their steady-state popular ions and their responsiveness to local inflammatory reactions, in which the number and quality of coelomic cells can be greatly increased and modified. We have addressed the question of whether the increase in cell infiltrate in the inflamed abdominal cavity is sustained by the proliferation of myeloid cells in the omentum, and if so what are the characteristics of the progenitor cells involved and how the omentum controls their proliferation and differentiation. In the omentum under normal conditions and with inflammation due to schistosomal infection we found that pluripotent early myeloid progenitors were capable of giving rise to all the myeloid lineages in clonogenic assays, but not to the totipotent blood stem cells. Besides the major haemopoietins (GM-CSF, M-CSF, G-CSF, IL-5), the omentum stroma constitutively expressed SDF-1alpha, the chemokine which elicits homing of circulating early haemopoietic progenitors. While normal omentum stroma produced LIF, its expression was substituted by SCF in inflamed tissues. In the first situation a slow steady-state renewal of progenitors is potentially favoured, while their intense expansion may be predominant in the latter one. We propose that the increase in cells in the abdominal cavity in inflammatory reactions is due to the enhanced input and expansion of early myeloid progenitors sustaining the in situ production of abdominal cell populations, rather than to the input of systemic circulating inflammatory cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据