4.0 Article

Subclinical hypothyroidism as a risk factor for placental abruption: Evidence from a low-risk primigravid population

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12131

关键词

placental abruption; subclinical hypothyroidism; thyroid autoimmunity

资金

  1. Rotunda Hospital/Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundSubclinical thyroid hypofunction in pregnancy has been shown to have an association with neurodevelopmental delay in the offspring. It is unclear whether obstetric factors may account for this observation. AimsTo establish the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in a low-risk primigravid population and to explore its association with obstetric sequelae. Materials and MethodsNine hundred and fifty-three primigravid women had thyroid hormone indices analysed in the early second trimester. Delivery and neonatal outcomes were available for 904 women who met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Women with subclinical hypothyroidism (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) values at or above the 98th percentile with a normal free thyroxine (fT4)) or isolated maternal hypothyroxinaemia (fT4 level at or below the second percentile with a normal-range TSH) were compared with biochemically euthyroid controls. Chi-squared test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. ResultsThe prevalence of SCH or isolated maternal hypothyroxinaemia was 4%. Positivity for antithyroid peroxidase (TPO) or antithyroglobulin (ATG) antibodies correlated with SCH status (P=0.02). Placental abruption was observed more commonly in the setting of either SCH or isolated maternal hypothyroxinaemia when compared with euthyroid controls (P=0.02 and 0.04, respectively). ConclusionsSubclinical hypothyroidism and isolated maternal hypothyroxinaemia are associated with placental abruption. The observation of these effects in this healthy low-risk population lends weight to the case for antenatal screening for diminished thyroid reserve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据