4.6 Article

c-MYC activation in primary and metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Incidence, mechanisms, and clinical significance

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 462-469

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880547

关键词

amplification; c-MYC; FISH; overexpression; pancreatic cancer; PanIN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amplification and overexpression of c-MYC is a common event in various neoplasias. Recently, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) of primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas revealed a distinct high-level amplification of 8q23-qter, suggesting that c-MYC located on 8q24 may be a candidate oncogene. To evaluate the biological significance and prognostic value of c-MYC activation in pancreatic carcinoma, we performed interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry on a series of 69 primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 19 corresponding lymph node metastases, and 5 pancreatic intraductal lesions. Dual color FISH using a probe for c-MYC (8q24) and a centromeric probe for chromosome 8 revealed amplification of c-MYC in 32.3% and 29.4% of primary and metastatic tumors, respectively. Immunostaining identified c-MYC protein overexpression in 43.5% of primaries and 31.6% of metastases. Low concordance between positive FISH and immunostaining (13.4%) suggests multiple independent regulatory pathways of c-MYC activation. Statistical ;evaluation revealed significant correlation (alpha = 0.033) between c-MYC protein overexpression and histopathological tumor grade but absence of correlation with tumor stage or lymph node status. Analysis of pancreatic Intraductal lesions showed c-MYC amplification and protein overexpression in two of five cases in which invasive carcinoma exhibited identical aberrations. We conclude that deregulation of c-MYC protein is common in pancreatic cancer and that it may be involved in early neoplastic development and progression rather than in locoregional spread of invasive cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据