4.5 Article

Effect of the cytoskeletal prestress on the mechanical impedance of cultured airway smooth muscle cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 1443-1450

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00782.2001

关键词

storage modulus; loss modulus; oscillatory cytometry; actin network; cytoskeletal mechanics

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-33009, HL-65371] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effect of the cytoskeletal prestress (P) on the elastic and frictional properties of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells during oscillatory loading; P is preexisting tensile stress in the actin cytoskeleton generated by the cell contractile apparatus. We oscillated (0.1 Hz, 6 Pa peak to peak) small ferromagnetic beads bound to integrin receptors and computed the storage (elastic) modulus (G') and the loss (frictional) modulus (G) from the applied torque and the corresponding bead rotation. All measurements were done at baseline and after cells were treated with graded doses of either histamine (0.1, 1, 10 muM) or isoproterenol (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 muM). Values for P for these concentrations were taken from a previous study (Wang et al., Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, in press). It was found that G' and G, as well as P, increased/decreased with increasing doses of histamine/isoproterenol. Both G' and G exhibited linear dependences on P: G'(Pa) = 0.20P + 82 and G(Pa) = 0.05P + 32. The dependence of G' on P is consistent with our previous findings and with the behavior of stress-supported structures. The dependence of G on P is a novel finding. It could be attributed to a variety of mechanisms. Some of those mechanisms are discussed in detail. We concluded that, in addition to the central mechanisms by which stress-supported structures develop mechanical stresses, other mechanisms might need to be invoked to fully explain the observed dependence of the cell mechanical properties on the state of cell contractility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据