4.7 Article

Habitat requirements for establishment of Sphagnum from spores

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 268-278

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00653.x

关键词

colonization; germination; mire; nutrient demand; safe site

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 The ecological significance of the spore in perennial bryophytes has been questioned. In Sphagnum, protonemata have rarely been observed in the field and P-concentrations in natural waters are insufficient for spore establishment. 2 We determined requirements for establishment of Sphagnum spores in growth chamber experiments. Up to 17 species were tested on peat with various natural substrates added and with different mire waters. In a field experiment, the effect of cover of nutrient depleted Eriophorum-litter was also tested. 3 There were large differences between substrates. and establishment appeared to be limited by the amount of phosphate released. Added moose dung or litter of Betula pubescens promoted establishment well above the low level seen on peat alone, or with added litter from Pinus sylvestris. 4 Species differed slightly in response to different mire waters and to added substrates, but these differences could not be attributed to the natural habitat of the species or their breeding system. There was a weak negative relationship between spore size and establishment success. 5 In the field experiment, about 1% of the sown, viable spores established in the presence of moose dung or Betula litter. With moose dung there was an indication that protonemata and plants of other bryophytes had a negative effect on the establishment of Sphagnum. 6 Nutrient release from litter and cover provided by vascular plants are needed to generate safe sites for the establishment of Sphagnum from spores, especially on wet, acidic and relatively nutrient-poor soils and peat. Recruitment from spores may therefore be important in Sphagnum, particularly following disturbance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据