4.4 Review

P53, proto-oncogene and rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 299-310

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/sarh.2002.31550

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; proto-oncogenes; tumor suppressor protein p53; synovium hyperplasia; apoptosis; metalloproteinases; gene therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To review the literature published in the past 6 years concerning the role of p53 tumor-suppressor protein in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify all publications that covered the role of p53 in RA. In addition, selected articles related to protooncogenes and matrix metalloproteinases were included in this review. Results: p53 protein is expressed in RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs), and its overexpression is a characteristic feature of RA. The overexpression of p53 is probably induced by DNA strand breaks caused by the genotoxic environment of RA joints, in some cases because of p53 mutations. Independent studies from 3 groups indicated that p53 mutations can and do occur in RA synovial tissue samples derived from a subset of RA patients. Inactivation of p53 may contribute to the invasiveness of FLSs and to the high-level expression of cartilage degradation enzymes as well. Gene transfer or gene knockout studies using a collagen-II-induced RA animal model to examine the role of p53 in RA have been reported. Initial results are positive and indicate that gene transfer of p53 may be clinically useful for the management of RA. Conclusions: p53 protein is expressed in RA FLSs, and its overexpression is a characteristic feature of RA. p53 mutations occur in the synovial tissues derived from a subset of RA patients. The clinical implications of p53 expression and the functional importance of somatic mutations in RA, however, are still unclear. Further research is needed to fully understand the implications of these findings and develop corresponding new therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据