4.6 Article

Cellular oxidant stress and advanced glycation endproducts of albumin: Caveats of the dichlorofluorescein assay

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 400, 期 1, 页码 15-25

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/abbi.2002.2776

关键词

glycation; methylglyoxal; oxidative stress; dichlorofluorescein; albumin

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY 07099, P-30 EY 11373] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG 18629] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to understand the mechanism by which advanced glycation endproducts (AGES) elicit oxidative stress, macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells were exposed to various AGE-albumins, and oxidant stress was estimated from the fluorescence of oxidized dichlorofluorescein using the microtiter plate assay. Strongest fluorescence was observed with methylglyoxal modified albumin (MGO-BSA) compared with native albumin. Similar effects that were prevented by arginine coincubation were seen with phenylglyoxal-BSA. MGO-BSA had increased affinity for Cu2+ and Ca2+, but was conformationally similar to native albumin. Surprisingly, the mere addition of unmodified albumin to cells suppressed the fluorescence of oxidized DCF. While, several site-directed mutants of human serum albumin (HSA), including C34S and recombinant domains II and III retained fluorescence suppressing activity, proteolytic digests, recombinant domain I, and several nonalbumin proteins failed to suppress. Kinetic and ANS binding studies suggested albumin quenches DCF fluorescence by binding to hydrophobic pockets in domains II and III and that MGO-BSA is less hydrophobic than BSA. Finally, BSA also prevented H2O2 catalyzed DCF fluorescence more potently than MGO-BSA. These studies reveal important caveats of the widely used dichlorofluorescein assay and suggest methods other than the microtiter plate assay are needed to accurately assess cellular oxidant stress in presence of native or modified albumin. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据