4.1 Article

Survey of the incidence of chestnut rot in south-eastern Australia

期刊

AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 63-72

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13313-012-0170-2

关键词

Castanea crenata; Castanea sativa; Endophyte; Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi

资金

  1. University of Sydney
  2. Faculty of Agriculture and Environment
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust
  4. Horticulture Australia Limited
  5. Chestnuts Australia Inc.
  6. Australian chestnut growers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chestnut rot of Castanea sativa (European chestnut) and C. crenata (Japanese chestnut) x C. sativa hybrids is a significant problem facing the Australian chestnut industry. It affects the chestnut kernel, symptoms occur as pale, medium and dark brown lesions occurring on the endosperm and embryo. Twenty-two orchards in Victoria and New South Wales were surveyed in 2008, and 21 of these were again surveyed in 2009. All 22 orchards were affected by chestnut rot. Incidence at individual orchards up to 72 % was found in 2008, and 35 % in 2009. Incidence varied widely between orchards and within individual orchards between the 2 years. All varieties were affected, including Decoppi Marone, Purton's Pride and Red Spanish, displaying examples of both high incidence (> 1 %) and industry acceptable incidence (0-1 %) depending on orchard and year. In 2008 and 2009, surveys of Sydney Markets showed incidence of > 1 % (2008: varieties Decoppi Marone, Purton's Pride; and in 2009: varieties Purton's Pride, Red Spanish). The early December flowering Red Spanish had significantly higher average incidence than the early to mid December flowering Decoppi Marone and Purton's Pride, suggesting that the timing of flowering may be an important factor affecting incidence. There was a mild positive correlation between orchard incidence and December rainfall of the previous year (r(2) = 0.4), indicating rainfall during the chestnut flowering period had a mild effect on incidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据