4.4 Article

Comparative structure analysis of tyrosine and valine residues in unprocessed silk fibroin (silk I) and in the processed silk fiber (silk II) from Bombyx mori using solid-state 13C, 15N, and 2H NMR

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 13, 页码 4415-4424

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0119013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solid-state C-13 CP-MAS NMR spectra of biosynthetically labeled [C-13(alpha)]Tyr, [C-13(beta)]Tyr, and [C-13(alpha)]Val silk fibroin samples of Bombyx mori, in silk I (the solid-state structure before spinning) and silk II (the solid-state structure after spinning) forms, have been examined to gain insight into the conformational preferences of the semicrystalline regions. To establish the relationship between the primary structure of B. mori silk fibroin and the local structure, the conformation-dependent C-13 chemical shift contour plots for Tyr C-alpha, Tyr C-beta, and Val C-alpha, carbons were generated from the atomic coordinates of high-resolution crystal structures of 40 proteins and their characteristic C-13 isotropic NMR chemical shifts. From comparison of the observed Tyr C-alpha and Tyr C-beta chemical shifts with those predicted by the contour plots, there is strong evidence in favor of an antiparallel beta-sheet structure of the Tyr residues in the silk fibroin fibers. On the other hand, Tyr residues take a random coil conformation in the fibroin film with a silk I form. The Val residues are likely to assume a structure similar to those of Tyr residues in silk fiber and film. Solid-state H-2 NMR measurements of [3,3-H-2(2)]Tyr-labeled B. mori silk fibroin indicate that the local mobility of the backbone and the C-alpha-C-beta bond is essentially static in both silk I and silk II forms. The orientation-dependent (i.e., parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field) solid-state N-15 NMR spectra of biosynthetically labeled [N-15]Tyr and [N-15]Val silk fibers reveal the presence of highly oriented semicrystalline regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据