3.8 Article

Pregnancy induced hypertension in women with gestational carbohydrate intolerance: the diagest study

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00556-5

关键词

pregnancy induced hypertension; gestational glucose intolerance; gestational diabetes mellitus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the relationship between pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and gestational glucose intolerance. Methods: A 50 1 h glucose loading test was offered to all pregnant women between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation in 15 centres in northern France during 8 months in 1992. If the test was positive (greater than or equal to7.2 mmol/l), the woman underwent a 3 h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as soon as possible. Using the criteria of Carpenter and Coustan, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was defined by two abnormal values (n = 218) and gestational mild hyperglycemia (GMH) by one abnormal value (n = 130). Each control group was defined by a 50 g, 1 h loading test result of <7.2 mmol/l (n = 108). PIH included gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia (PE). GH was defined as a diastolic pressure of more than 85 mmHg on at least two occasions arising during pregnancy. PE was defined as GH with proteinuria greater than or equal to500 mg/24 h. Results: The rate of PIH in the three groups (GDM; GMH and control group, C) was, respectively 17.0, 10.8, and 4.6%. All the six PE occured in the GDM group. Univariate analysis showed significantly higher rate of hypertension in women with a history of PE, increasing body mass index before pregnancy (BMI) and glucose intolerance. In multivariate analysis with adjustment for primiparity, independant risk factors for PIH were a history of PE, BMI >27 and GDM, contrary to GMH and maternal age. Conclusions: PIH appears to be linked to the level of glucose intolerance during pregnancy, independently of other known factors of hypertension. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据