3.8 Article

Expression of three mitochondrial solute carriers, citrin, aralarl and ornithine transporter, in relation to urea cycle in mice

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4781(01)00376-1

关键词

aralar1; aspartate/glutamate carriers; citrin; ornithine transporter 1; Slc25a12; Slc25a13; type II citrullinemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present report describes the expression profiles of different tissues and developmental changes of mouse aspartate/glutamate carrier (AGC) genes, Slc25a13 and Slc25a12, and an ornithine transporter gene, Ornt1, in relation to urea cycle enzyme genes, carbarnoylphosphate synthetase I (CPS) and argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS). Slc25a13 encodes citrin, recently found to be deficient in adult-onset type 11 citrullinemia, and to function as AGC together with its isoform and product of Slc25a12, aralar1. Citrin was broadly distributed, but mainly in the Ever, kidney and heart. Aralar1 was expressed in diaphragm, skeletal muscle, heart, brain and kidney, but not in the Ever. These distribution profiles are different from the restricted of Ornt1, ASS and CPS. Citrin, ASS, CPS and Ornt1 showed similar patterns of developmental changes in the liver and small intestine, where they play a role in urea and arginine synthesis. Dietary, hormonal and physical manipulations caused varied changes of CPS, ASS and Ornt1 in the liver, but the change of citrin was not so marked as that of the others. Analysis using RT-PCR and restriction enzyme digestion revealed that the ornithine transporter most expressed is Ornt1, although Ornt2 is detectable at a minute level. All these results suggest that citrin as AGC plays a role in urea synthesis as well as many fundamental metabolic pathways in the liver, and shares metabolic functions with aralarl in other tissues, and that Ornt1 is an important component in urea synthesis in the liver and in arginine synthesis in the small intestine during the neonatal period. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据